Carluccios.
1. Hygiene was very good. Obviously frequently cleaned.
2. Design was very functional yet classy.
3. Sexual assault unlikely due to proximity to public area and good lighting.
Bushy area
1. Hygiene not great. Urine smell was what defined this as a toilet destination. V poor.
2. Designed as a wall with a bush alongside, as improvised toilets go not a great one. The cover was sparse.
3. Likelyhood of sexual assault. Fairly high.
Marks and Spencer's
1. Hygiene surprisingly poor. Floor was wet with urine and smelled.
2. Design. Similar to whole store, which I consider a mistake. Cafe and toilet same design stand? A no no.
3. Likelihood of misdemeanour sexual assault / harassment pretty high. A man brushed my buttock with his bag. The pervert.
Coal restaurant
1. Hygiene. You can even see urine stains in the photo. Poor.
2. Design. Horrible.
3. Chance of sexual assault. Disturbingly high. It was in a poorly lit basement. Meeting a dedicated pervert would be disastrous.
Shop doorway
1. hygiene. Poor. Smell of urine again more designating this a toilet area.
2. Design. As a toilet? Poor.
3. Chance of sexual assault. High. More chance of arrest really. Hopefully you'd be arrested before the assault took place.
And that is my report on exeter's toilet spots. Happy hunting.
